I recently finished reading Dr. John W. Pilley’s new book, Chaser: Unlocking the genius of the dog who knows a thousand words (view on Amazon). You might have heard of Chaser; over the past couple of years she has appeared on NBC’s Today Show, ABC’s World News, and PBS’s Nova ScienceNow, as well as in countless newspaper articles.
I really enjoyed this book and highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in dog behavior, dog training, animal learning, and animal intelligence. It’s a fascinating book that follows the adventures of Dr. Pilley, a retired psychology professor, and Chaser as they explore the limits of canine learning.
Do dogs really understand language?
I was talking to someone recently who said she wasn’t that impressed by Chaser, as her dog understands lots of different words. Dogs are smart. However, in daily life, dogs are often guided by a combination of our words, plus, the environmental context, our body language, and many other factors.
For example, you tell your dog, “Spot, go get your ball and let’s go outside.” Spot goes, gets her ball, and heads to the back door. Did Spot understand each individual word and its grammatical function? Or, did she only recognize key words in the sentence, such as “Spot,” “ball,” and “outside?” Or, did she ignore the words and respond instead to your tone of voice and the fact that you picked up your coat and headed toward the door?
Because Spot’s behavior could be explained in several different ways, scientists have (rightly so) been skeptical about whether dogs understand the unique meanings of individual words, as well as the functions of different words when they are combined within a sentence.
For researchers, there are still many unanswered questions about canine learning, including whether dogs can comprehend individual words as referring to objects (independently of actions), whether dogs can learn basic grammatical structures, whether dogs can learn new words by exclusion, and more. These are some of the questions that Dr. Pilley hoped to answer with Chaser.
Chaser’s language lessons
Dr. Pilley traces his journey with Chaser and describes his challenges and triumphs as he teaches her everything from basic obedience behaviors, to sheep herding, to advanced language skills. It’s evident from the book that Dr. Pilley loves and respects his dogs and that Chaser is a well-loved member of his family. I really enjoyed that he discusses several times in the book that he sees Chaser as his research partner, not as an experimental subject.
Much of Chaser’s training revolved around play and social interaction, which I found particularly interesting. These elements are also common to language learning for young children, which could have contributed to Dr. Pilley’s success. For example, Dr. PIlley would ask Chaser to find a certain object, and then spend three to five minutes playing with Chaser and the toy. While reading the book, I wondered as well if these long periods of reinforcement that involved the object whose name was being learned also contributed to Chaser’s learning.
Because most of Chaser’s training involved fun play, Dr. Pilley and Chaser often spent four to five hours a day working on language training. And this training definitely paid off! By the time Chaser was seven and a half months old, she had already learned the names of more than 200 objects. She had also demonstrated that she could learn the name of a new toy after just hearing the name one time and that she could learn as many as ten new words a day. Pretty impressive for a young pup!
Learning one thousand words (and more)
In the book, Dr. Pilley also describes his research process, including how he controlled for possible doubts and questions about Chaser’s talents. Using rigorous experimental designs that controlled for things like Clever Hans effects, Dr. Pilley has published several academic papers that demonstrate that Chaser is in fact responding to individual words and grammar elements. He’s also done a lot in his research to counter some of the criticisms of earlier canine language research.
I found it humorous that once Chaser had learned close to 1,000 object names, her memory was much better than Dr. Pilley’s. In the book he describes some of the “blind” tests, where someone else arranged a collection of objects behind a screen and then gave Dr. Pilley a list of object names to ask Chaser. In the book, Dr. Pilley writes that sometimes he would read a name out loud and he wouldn’t be able to remember which toy it referred to, but Chaser would remember and bring him the correct toy!
Chaser’s amazing language learning goes much farther than just learning the names of 1,000 different toys. Dr. Pilley also describes some of the work that he and Chaser have done regarding category words, learning by exclusion, one trial learning, match to sample, combining nouns and verbs, learning through imitation, and learning direct objects (such as take A to B vs. take B to A).
Finally, one thing I really liked about this book is that it is evident that Dr. Pilley respects and seeks to learn from professional animal trainers. Dr. Pilley discusses at length several of his friends who train working Border collies and the amazing things that these dogs learn as part of their daily work herding sheep. In the book, Dr. Pilley writes that his interactions with Chaser and other dogs have taught him that “We all learn better and faster when learning is fun.” I hope we can all remember this, anytime we are teaching an animal (or another human).
Book giveaway!
**Thanks to all who entered! This book giveaway is now closed.
I will be giving away a copy of Dr. Pilley’s Chaser book on my blog! It’s really easy to enter, all you have to do is leave a comment on this post. I’ll pick one winner at random on Thursday night (Dec 19) at midnight, so if you’re interested in winning, please leave your comment before then.
And if you don’t win the giveaway, Chaser, of course, is also available through Amazon, as well as most major bookstores.
Note: I received a review copy of this book from the Publisher, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt earlier this fall. I was under no obligation to write a review of the book on my blog.



I was just noticing the other day that I think that my current foster dog, Sophie, knows certain words, such as “Frisbee”. When I play with her with the Frisbee, I’m talking to her and saying things such as, “You have Frisbee” or “I have Frisbee”. So that when we’re still 20 feet away, I can say “Get Frisbee”, she looks for it, spots it, and then gets it and not something else, such as a cone.
This sounds like a very interesting book and probably a fairly easy read.
I should probably go play now with Miss Sophie. 🙂
Thrilled to see your review.
How is this going to change “clicker training”?
One reason I think for the
reluctance to ascribe understanding of spoken language to dogs is our own
limited understanding of how we humans understand our language.
There is a lot more to human language
than just the meaning of each separate word. Inflection, and body and facial
language contribute significantly.
It has been estimated that in
spoken conversations only somewhere between 7% and 35% is verbal (ie words). (Ref: Alan Pease “Body Language”)
I would posit that the reasons
dogs do not understand much of what we say, is because they do not understand
the concepts that we are talking about. (Budianski covered this in s “If a
Lion Could Talk”.)
When it comes to actually talking
to or dogs about what concerns them I’m sure that a normal dog’s understanding
is about that of a two year old toddler and with those dogs who are gifted AND
been exposed to people talking to them well above this 🙂
Of course if you only communicate
with your dog through one word commands, your dog would have no better
comprehension than your average Army Private 🙂
Sounds like such a fun book. I know my Australian Shepherds over the years have been great at knowing and understanding words – even though I never worked at the numbers of words. I wouldn’t want to miss the chance to be in on this book draw. Thanks for the opportunity Mary.
Very well written. This makes me want to get the book and read more. What is Dr. Pilley’s background? Did he attempt to teach the objects in an errorless fashion or just by playing fetch? I first thought he just tought Chaser names to objects, I did not know he also worked with her on hearding and did this in a game as well.
Since I never win anything, I ordered the book. 🙂
Another great blog post! I live with and train multiple species–cats, birds, horses–and delight in showing visitors how my pets “understand” me. Of course that’s questionable, as you’ve so neatly explained, but most people don’t know the intricate interaction of body language, verbal cues, and chained behaviors, so they’re just awed by my impressiveness. LOL Works for me!
Connecting cues to actions is about as simple as it gets if you’ve got an animal who is willing to deal with this human nonsense. Not all are, which makes the human-focused ones look even more genius by comparison.
It would be interesting to find out how many years these accomplishments took.
We could all learn a lot as a pack leader.
Great review. I think it’s important for people to realize that dogs are not “understanding language,” but are “hearing cues” in studies like this. I say that not to take away any of the wonder that they can remember the quantity of cues they obviously can, but to caution all of us to continue to avoid anthropomorphism, which I think leads to expectations that dogs can’t meet and can cause failure in training. That is, unless Dr. Pilley’s research shows something different – I guess I’ll find out when I read the book!
Dr. Pilley and Chaser have added one more study that challenges the paradigm that the human species has abilities which are not present in other species. The use of tools, culture, generational transmission of knowledge, a concept of self, emotional feelings – now we can add “category words, learning by exclusion, one trial learning, match to sample, combining nouns and verbs, learning through imitation, and learning direct objects (such as take A to B vs. take B to A).” That Dr. Tilley considers Chaser his research partner suggests a world view that encourages him to explore Chaser’s abilities
I believe that most animals can learn to respond to verbal cues. I am amazed that traditional dressage training shuns the use of the trainer’s/rider’s voice and that the rider is actually marked down in the show ring for using his/her voice. Adding the voice cue after the desired behavior is established allows the trainer to use less perceptible physical cues both in the saddle and on the ground. I find that traditional horse trainers do not take advantage of the horse’s ability to respond to verbal cues.
One of the best things about moving away from traditional riding is that I can talk to her as little or as much as feels right! There are times when we are in a silent, non-verbal bubble of understanding and times when words are just what we need. But then Haflingers are well known for being a more vocal breed of horse!
Kate
Thank you for the interesting review, Mary! I’d love to read this. I’m especially curious how he did the training and controlled for the Clever Hans phenomenon. Please enter me in the drawing!
I love the reviews on the blog… I decided on books to buy or seminars to attend
I love when science can finally debunk some previous science perceptions and myths. Most of us knew that dogs (animals) can learn many spoken words as well as body language, whistles, clicks. Amazing though that we often don’t give dogs enough credit for what they can learn.
Thanks for the interesting review. We are just beginning to learn what dogs are capable of. I have Border Collies and do herding with them so I will have to get this book!
will be interested to read the book. Read articles and a book about Alex (parrot) and how he learned, fascinating stuff!
I have been wanting to read this book for a while! It’s actually on my request list at my local library. It sounds very interesting!
your review has made me very interested in reading this book!
thanks!
Good stuff. Now this is on my “Must Read” list. Thanks.
This book sounds like a must read for anyone interested in dog cognition and what it is that our animals understand when we talk to them. Would also love to know how Dr Pilley set up his learning sessions. Without getting into anthropomorphism, I do believe that our dogs pick up much of our language naturally, without any formalised training sessions.
Didn’t know he was writing a book – can’t wait to read it. Thanks for the review Mary!